Two-gap and paramagnetic pair-breaking effects on upper critical field of SmFeAsO$_{0.85}$ and SmFeAsO$_{0.8}$F$_{0.2}$ single crystals
Hyun-Sook Lee, Marek Bartkowiak, Jae-Hyun Park, Jae-Yeap Lee, Ju-Young, Kim, Nak-Heon Sung, B. K. Cho, Chang-Uk Jung, Jun Sung Kim, Hu-Jong Lee

TL;DR
This study explores how two-gap superconductivity and paramagnetic effects influence the upper critical field in SmFeAsO-based single crystals, revealing deviations from traditional models and highlighting the complex pairing mechanisms.
Contribution
It demonstrates the roles of two-gap superconductivity and paramagnetic pair-breaking effects in shaping the upper critical field behavior of SmFeAsO crystals.
Findings
$H_{c2}(T)$ deviates from one-gap theory at low temperatures.
Two-gap nature affects $H_{c2}^c(T)$ behavior.
Paramagnetic effects influence $H_{c2}^{ab}(T)$.
Abstract
We investigated the temperature dependence of the upper critical field [] of fluorine-free SmFeAsO and fluorine-doped SmFeAsOF single crystals by measuring the resistive transition in low static magnetic fields and in pulsed fields up to 60 T. Both crystals show that 's along the c axis [] and in an -planar direction [] exhibit a linear and a sublinear increase, respectively, with decreasing temperature below the superconducting transition. 's in both directions deviate from the conventional one-gap Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg theoretical prediction at low temperatures. A two-gap nature and the paramagnetic pair-breaking effect are shown to be responsible for the temperature-dependent behavior of and , respectively.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
