Rate and nature of false positives in the CoRoT exoplanet search
J.M. Almenara, H.J. Deeg, et al

TL;DR
This study assesses the false positive rates in CoRoT's exoplanet search, revealing that most initial detections are false positives, with a small fraction confirmed as planets, and compares results with theoretical predictions.
Contribution
It provides an empirical analysis of false positive rates in CoRoT data and compares these with semiempirical models, highlighting discrepancies at low transit depths.
Findings
83% of initial detections are false positives.
12% of follow-up candidates are confirmed planets.
False positive rate distribution aligns with predictions except below 0.4% transit depth.
Abstract
Context. The CoRoT satellite searches for planets by applying the transit method, monitoring up to 12 000 stars in the galactic plane for 150 days in each observation run. This search is contaminated by a large fraction of false positives, caused by different binary configurations that might be confused with a transiting planet. Aims. We evaluate the rates and nature of false positives in the CoRoT exoplanets search and compare our results with semiempirical predictions. Methods. We consider the detected binary and planet candidates in the first three extended CoRoT runs, and classify the results of the follow-up observations completed to verify their planetary nature. We group the follow-up results into undiluted binaries, diluted binaries, and planets and compare their abundances with predictions from the literature. Results. 83% of the initial detections are classified as false…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
