# Estimators for CMB Statistical Anisotropy

**Authors:** Duncan Hanson, Antony Lewis

arXiv: 0908.0963 · 2012-03-06

## TL;DR

This paper develops and applies quadratic maximum-likelihood estimators to analyze and constrain models of statistical anisotropy in the CMB, using real data from WMAP, revealing potential anisotropic signals and their systematic contamination.

## Contribution

It introduces an optimal QML estimator framework for CMB anisotropy analysis and applies it to WMAP data to test various anisotropic models, including spatial modulation and primordial power spectrum anisotropy.

## Key findings

- Detected a dipolar modulation with 7% amplitude at low multipoles
- Found a quadrupole anisotropy aligned with the ecliptic plane, likely due to systematics
- Constrained primordial anisotropies and discussed their relation to non-Gaussianity

## Abstract

We use quadratic maximum-likelihood (QML) estimators to constrain models with Gaussian but statistically anisotropic Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) fluctuations, using CMB maps with realistic sky-coverage and instrumental noise. This approach is optimal when the anisotropy is small, or when checking for consistency with isotropy. We demonstrate the power of the QML approach by applying it to the WMAP data to constrain several models which modulate the observed CMB fluctuations to produce a statistically anisotropic sky. We first constrain an empirically motivated spatial modulation of the observed CMB fluctuations, reproducing marginal evidence for a dipolar modulation pattern with amplitude 7% at L < 60, but demonstrate that the effect decreases at higher multipoles and is 1% at L~500. We also look for evidence of a direction-dependent primordial power spectrum, finding a very statistically significant quadrupole signal nearly aligned with the ecliptic plane; however we argue this anisotropy is largely contaminated by observational systematics. Finally, we constrain the anisotropy due to a spatial modulation of adiabatic and isocurvature primordial perturbations, and discuss the close relationship between anisotropy and non-Gaussianity estimators.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/0908.0963/full.md

## Figures

12 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/0908.0963/full.md

## References

53 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/0908.0963/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/0908.0963