The impact of systematic uncertainties in stellar parameters on integrated spectra of stellar populations
Susan M. Percival (1), Maurizio Salaris (1)((1) Liverpool John Moores, University)

TL;DR
Systematic uncertainties in stellar atmospheric parameters like temperature, gravity, and metallicity can significantly bias stellar population synthesis models, affecting age estimates and chemical composition interpretations.
Contribution
This study quantifies how mismatches in fundamental stellar parameters impact SPS models and diagnostic line indices, highlighting potential sources of error in stellar population analysis.
Findings
Offsets of 100K in T_eff can alter age estimates.
Offsets of 0.15 dex in [Fe/H] significantly affect line indices.
Systematic errors can mimic effects of non-solar abundance ratios.
Abstract
In this paper we investigate a hitherto unexplored source of potentially significant error in stellar population synthesis (SPS) models, caused by systematic uncertainties associated with the three fundamental stellar atmospheric parameters; effective temperature T_eff, surface gravity g, and iron abundance [Fe/H]. All SPS models rely on calibrations of T_eff, logg and [Fe/H] scales, which are implicit in stellar models, isochrones and synthetic spectra, and are explicitly adopted for empirical spectral libraries. We assess the effect of a mismatch in scales between isochrones and spectral libraries (the two key components of SPS models) and quantify the effects on 23 commonly used diagnostic line indices. We find that typical systematic offsets of 100K in T_eff, 0.15 dex in [Fe/H] and/or 0.25 dex in logg significantly alter inferred absolute ages of simple stellar populations (SSPs)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
