Empirical Constraints on the Evolution of the Relationship between Black Hole and Galaxy Mass: Scatter Matters
Rachel S. Somerville

TL;DR
This paper constrains the evolution of the black hole-galaxy mass relationship using high-redshift data, highlighting the importance of scatter and realistic assumptions in interpreting observational limits.
Contribution
It provides new bounds on the zero-point evolution of the black hole-galaxy mass relation by incorporating scatter and realistic quasar activity fractions.
Findings
Black holes were about 2 times larger at z=1 compared to today.
At z=2, black holes could be 5-6 times more massive relative to galaxies without evolution.
Including scatter relaxes constraints, allowing no evolution in the relation.
Abstract
I investigate whether useful constraints on the evolution of the relationship between galaxy mass and black hole (BH) mass can be obtained from recent measurements of galaxy stellar mass functions and QSO bolometric luminosity functions at high redshift. I assume a simple power-law relationship between galaxy mass and BH mass, as implied by BH mass measurements at low redshift, and consider only evolution in the zero-point of the relation. I argue that one can obtain a lower limit on the zero-point evolution by assuming that every galaxy hosts a BH, shining at its Eddington rate. One can obtain an upper limit by requiring that the number of massive BH at high redshift does not exceed that observed locally. I find that, under these assumptions, and neglecting scatter in the BH-galaxy mass relation, BH must have been a factor of about 2 times larger at z=1 and 5 to 6 times more massive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
