Analytic mappings between noncommutative pencil balls

TL;DR

This paper extends the analysis of noncommutative analytic functions from matrix balls to more general pencil balls, characterizing the structure of maps that preserve these sets in a dimension-free setting.

Contribution

It introduces the concept of pencil ball maps and shows they can be decomposed into a minimal defining pencil plus an analytic map, generalizing previous results on NC ball maps.

Findings

Every pencil ball has a minimal defining pencil.

Pencil ball maps are essentially direct sums of a minimal pencil and an NC analytic map.

The structure of pencil ball maps contrasts with classical complex analysis results.

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze problems involving matrix variables for which we use a noncommutative algebra setting. To be more specific, we use a class of functions (called NC analytic functions) defined by power series in noncommuting variables and evaluate these functions on sets of matrices of all dimensions; we call such situations dimension-free. In an earlier paper we characterized NC analytic maps that send dimension-free matrix balls to dimension-free matrix balls and carry the boundary to the boundary; such maps we call "NC ball maps". In this paper we turn to a more general dimension-free ball B_L, called a "pencil ball", associated with a homogeneous linear pencil L(x):= A_1 x_1 + ... + A_m x_m, where A_j are complex matrices. For an m-tuple X of square matrices of the same size, define L(X):=\sum A_j \otimes X_j and let B_L denote the set of all such tuples X satisfying ||L(X)||<1. We study the generalization of NC ball maps to these pencil balls B_L, and call them "pencil ball maps". We show that every B_L has a minimal dimensional (in a certain sense) defining pencil L'. Up to normalization, a pencil ball map is the direct sum of L' with an NC analytic map of the pencil ball into the ball. That is, pencil ball maps are simple, in contrast to the classical result of D'Angelo on such analytic maps in C^m. To prove our main theorem, this paper uses the results of our previous paper mentioned above plus entirely different techniques, namely, those of completely contractive maps.