The number counts, luminosity functions and evolution of microwave-selected (WMAP) blazars and radio galaxies
P. Giommi, S. Colafrancesco, P. Padovani, D. Gasparrini, E. Cavazzuti,, S. Cutini

TL;DR
This study identifies and analyzes microwave-selected blazars and radio galaxies from WMAP data, deriving their number counts, luminosity functions, and evolution, confirming their dominance in microwave and gamma-ray backgrounds.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive microwave-selected sample of blazars and radio galaxies, with detailed luminosity functions and evolutionary insights, aligning with radio frequency studies.
Findings
High identification rate (99%) of WMAP sources as blazars or radio galaxies.
Microwave-selected blazars are more abundant than BL Lacs, similar to gamma-ray observations.
Blazars and radio galaxies significantly contaminate CMB maps and are bright gamma-ray sources.
Abstract
(Abridged) We carried out an extensive search to identify the counterparts of all the sources listed in the WMAP 3-yr catalogue using literature and archival data. Our work led to the identification of 309 WMAP sources, 98% of which are blazars, radio quasars or radio galaxies. At present, 15 objects still remain without identification due to the lack of optical spectroscopic data or a clear radio counterpart. Our results allow us to define a flux limited sample of 203 high Galactic latitude microwave sources ( Jy, ) which is virtually completely identified (99%). The microwave band is ideally suited for blazar statistical studies since this is the part of the em spectrum that is least affected by the superposition of spectral components of different origin. Using this data-set we derived number counts, luminosity functions and cosmological…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
