A population-modulated bibliometric measure with an application in the field of statistics
John Panaretos, Chrisovaladis Malesios

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new bibliometric measure derived through confirmatory factor analysis that combines various indices to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of scientists' research performance.
Contribution
It presents a novel population-modulated bibliometric measure that integrates multiple scientific performance metrics for improved researcher assessment.
Findings
The combined measure offers a better overall evaluation of scientists.
Application to real data from statistics departments demonstrates its effectiveness.
The approach unifies various bibliometric indices into a single measure.
Abstract
We use confirmatory factor analysis to derive a unifying measure of comparison of scientists based on bibliometric measurements, by utilizing the h-index, some similar h-type indices as well as other common measures of scientific performance. We use a real data example from nine well-known departments of statistics to demonstrate our approach and argue that our combined measure results in a better overall evaluation of a researchers' scientific work.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsscientometrics and bibliometrics research
