Tunable locally-optimal geographical forwarding in wireless sensor networks with sleep-wake cycling nodes

TL;DR

This paper introduces a tunable, locally-optimal geographical forwarding strategy for wireless sensor networks with sleep-wake cycling nodes, balancing delay and progress to optimize network performance.

Contribution

It formulates a Markov decision process for relay selection, derives a simple near-optimal policy, and compares its performance with extremal policies for delay and energy efficiency.

Findings

SF policy closely matches optimal BF performance.

SF offers a tunable trade-off between delay and hop count.

Performance comparisons with MF and FF policies demonstrate flexibility.

Abstract

We consider a wireless sensor network whose main function is to detect certain infrequent alarm events, and to forward alarm packets to a base station, using geographical forwarding. The nodes know their locations, and they sleep-wake cycle, waking up periodically but not synchronously. In this situation, when a node has a packet to forward to the sink, there is a trade-off between how long this node waits for a suitable neighbor to wake up and the progress the packet makes towards the sink once it is forwarded to this neighbr. Hence, in choosing a relay node, we consider the problem of minimizing average delay subject to a constraint on the average progress. By constraint relaxation, involving a Lagrange multiplier, we formulate this next hop relay selection problem as a Markov decision process (MDP). The exact optimal solution (BF (Best Forward)) can be found, but is computationally intensive. Next, we consider a mathematically simplified model for which the optimal policy (SF (Simplified Forward)) turns out to be a simple one-step-look-ahead rule. Simulations show that SF is very close in performance to BF, even for reasonably small node density. We then study the end-to-end performance of SF in comparison with two extremal policies: Max Forward (MF), which makes the maximum possible progress per hop and thus reduces network energy consumption, and First Forward (FF), which forwards the packet to the first node to wake up, and thus tends to make end-to-end forwarding delays small. We find that, with appropriate choice of one hop average progress constraint, SF can be tuned to provide a favorable trade-off between end-to-end packet delay and the number of hops in the forwarding path.