Modelling the Galactic Magnetic Field on the Plane in 2D
T. R. Jaffe (1), J. P. Leahy (1), A. J. Banday (2, 3), S. M. Leach, (4, 5), S. R. Lowe (1), A. Wilkinson (1), ((1) JBCA Manchester, (2) CESR, Toulouse, (3) MPA Garching, (4) SISSA Trieste, (5) INFN Trieste)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a parametric 2D model of the Galactic magnetic field using synchrotron and rotation measure data, demonstrating the method's ability to constrain magnetic field components and their ratios in the Galactic plane.
Contribution
It presents a novel Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach to model and analyze the Galaxy's magnetic field components using observational data along the Galactic plane.
Findings
The coherent magnetic field component is a small fraction of the total.
An ordered component comparable to the isotropic random component is necessary.
The method can constrain multiple magnetic field parameters.
Abstract
We present a method for parametric modelling of the physical components of the Galaxy's magnetised interstellar medium, simulating the observables, and mapping out the likelihood space using a Markov Chain Monte-Carlo analysis. We then demonstrate it using total and polarised synchrotron emission data as well as rotation measures of extragalactic sources. With these three datasets, we define and study three components of the magnetic field: the large-scale coherent field, the small-scale isotropic random field, and the ordered field. In this first paper, we use only data along the Galactic plane and test a simple 2D logarithmic spiral model for the magnetic field that includes a compression and a shearing of the random component giving rise to an ordered component. We demonstrate with simulations that the method can indeed constrain multiple parameters yielding measures of, for example,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
