Follow-up observations at 16 and 33 GHz of extragalactic sources from WMAP 3-year data: I - Spectral properties
Matthew L. Davies, Thomas M. O. Franzen, Rod D. Davies, Richard J., Davis, Farhan Feroz, Ricardo Genova-Santos, Keith J. B. Grainge, David A., Green, Michael P. Hobson, Natasha Hurley-Walker, Anthony N. Lasenby, Marcos, Lopez-Caniego, Malak Olamaie, Carmen P. Padilla-Torres

TL;DR
This study presents follow-up high-frequency observations of extragalactic sources from WMAP data, revealing diverse spectral behaviors and highlighting variability effects, especially in fainter sources, with implications for understanding source spectra at microwave frequencies.
Contribution
It provides new simultaneous measurements at 16 and 33 GHz for WMAP sources, revealing spectral diversity and the impact of variability on flux density estimates.
Findings
44% of sources have rising spectra between 13.9 and 33.75 GHz
93% of sources have spectral index alpha < 0.5
Fainter sources show lower flux densities with VSA compared to WMAP, likely due to variability
Abstract
We present follow-up observations of 97 point sources from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) 3-year data, contained within the New Extragalactic WMAP Point Source (NEWPS) catalogue between declinations of -4 and +60 degrees; the sources form a flux-density-limited sample complete to 1.1 Jy (approximately 5 sigma) at 33 GHz. Our observations were made at 16 GHz using the Arcminute Microkelvin Imager (AMI) and at 33 GHz with the Very Small Array (VSA). 94 of the sources have reliable, simultaneous -- typically a few minutes apart -- observations with both telescopes. The spectra between 13.9 and 33.75 GHz are very different from those of bright sources at low frequency: 44 per cent have rising spectra (alpha < 0.0), where flux density is proportional to frequency^-alpha, and 93 per cent have spectra with alpha < 0.5; the median spectral index is 0.04. For the brighter…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
