Influential Mathematicians: Birth, Education and Affiliation
John Panaretos, Chrisovaladis Malesios

TL;DR
This paper examines the career trajectories of influential mathematicians to understand how dynamic factors like birthplace and education influence institutional impact, revealing persistent US dominance but also nuanced patterns.
Contribution
It introduces a dynamic analysis of mathematicians' career paths, moving beyond static metrics to better understand institutional influence and geographic patterns.
Findings
US dominance remains strong in mathematics
Some mathematicians' trajectories challenge static impact assumptions
Patterns of birthplace and education influence current affiliations
Abstract
Research output and impact is currently the focus of serious debate worldwide. Quantitative analyses based on a wide spectrum of indices indicate a clear advantage of US institutions as compared to institutions in Europe and the rest of the world. However the measures used to quantify research performance are mostly static: Even though research output is the result of a process that extends in time as well as in space, indices often only take into account the current affiliation when assigning influential research to institutions. In this paper, we focus on the field of mathematics and investigate whether the image that emerges from static indices persists when bringing in more dynamic information, through the study of the "trajectories" of highly cited mathematicians: birthplace, country of first degree, country of PhD and current affiliation. While the dominance of the US remains…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
