Performance of ab initio and density functional methods for conformational equilibria of CnH2n+2 alkane isomers (n=2-8)
David Gruzman, Amir Karton, and Jan M.L. Martin

TL;DR
This study evaluates the accuracy of various ab initio and density functional methods in predicting conformational energies of alkane isomers, highlighting the superior performance of double-hybrid functionals with dispersion corrections.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive assessment of DFT and ab initio methods for alkane conformations, establishing double-hybrid functionals as reliable standards.
Findings
Double-hybrid functionals match CCSD(T) quality for conformational energies.
Popular DFT functionals tend to overestimate or underestimate energies without corrections.
PW6B95 and BMK functionals show fewer deficiencies in conformer geometries.
Abstract
Conformational energies of n-butane, n-pentane, and n-hexane have been calculated at the CCSD(T) level and at or near the basis set limit. Post-CCSD(T) contribution were considered and found to be unimportant. The data thus obtained were used to assess the performance of a variety of density functional methods. Double-hybrid functionals like B2GP-PLYP and B2K-PLYP, especially with a small Grimme-type empirical dispersion correction, are capable of rendering conformational energies of CCSD(T) quality. These were then used as a `secondary standard' for a larger sample of alkanes, including isopentane and the branched hexanes as well as key isomers of heptane and octane. Popular DFT functionals like B3LYP, B3PW91, BLYP, PBE, and PBE0 tend to overestimate conformer energies without dispersion correction, while the M06 family severely underestimates GG interaction energies. Grimme-type…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
