W_L W_L Scattering in Higgsless Models: Identifying Better Effective Theories
Alexander S. Belyaev (Southampton U.), R. Sekhar Chivukula, Neil D., Christensen, Elizabeth H. Simmons (Michigan State U.), Hong-Jian He (Tsinghua, U., Beijing), Masafumi Kurachi (LANL), and Masaharu Tanabashi (Nagoya U.)

TL;DR
This paper evaluates how well simplified three-site models replicate the W_L W_L scattering behavior of continuum Higgsless models, proposing modifications to improve their accuracy and analyzing collider phenomenology implications.
Contribution
It introduces sum rules to compare Higgsless models and extends the three-site model to better approximate continuum theories, enhancing understanding of their collider phenomenology.
Findings
The three-site model can closely mimic continuum models with certain extensions.
Sum rules effectively measure the accuracy of simplified models.
The ring model with hidden local symmetry parameter 'a' can replicate continuum scattering.
Abstract
The three-site model has been offered as a benchmark for studying the collider phenomenology of Higgsless models. In this paper we analyze how well the three-site model performs as a general exemplar of Higgsless models in describing W_L W_L scattering, and which modifications can make it more representative. We employ general sum rules relating the masses and couplings of the Kaluza-Klein (KK) modes of the gauge fields in continuum and deconstructed Higgsless models as a way to compare the different theories. We show that the size of the four-point vertex for the (unphysical) Nambu-Goldstone modes and the degree to which the sum rules are saturated by contributions from the lowest-lying KK resonances both provide good measures of the extent to which a highly-deconstructed theory can accurately describe the low-energy physics of a continuum 5d Higgsless model. After comparing the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
