Superdense Massive Galaxies in Wings Local Clusters
T.Valentinuzzi, J. Fritz, B. M. Poggianti, A. Cava, D. Bettoni, G., Fasano, M. D'Onofrio, W.J. Couch, A. Dressler, M. Moles, A. Moretti, A., Omizzolo, P. Kjaergaard, E. Vanzella, J. Varela

TL;DR
This study identifies a significant population of superdense, massive, and old galaxies in local galaxy clusters, comparable in size to high-redshift galaxies, and discusses their implications for galaxy evolution.
Contribution
It reports the discovery of superdense massive galaxies in local clusters and analyzes their properties, providing insights into galaxy size evolution from high to low redshift.
Findings
Superdense galaxies constitute about 22% of massive cluster galaxies.
These galaxies have a median effective radius of 1.61 kpc and are predominantly S0 types.
The number density of superdense galaxies in local clusters is approximately 2.9x10^-2 Mpc^-3.
Abstract
Massive quiescent galaxies at z>1 have been found to have small physical sizes, hence to be superdense. Several mechanisms, including minor mergers, have been proposed for increasing galaxy sizes from high- to low-z. We search for superdense massive galaxies in the WIde-field Nearby Galaxy-cluster Survey (WINGS) of X-ray selected galaxy clusters at 0.04<z<0.07. We discover a significant population of superdense massive galaxies with masses and sizes comparable to those observed at high redshift. They approximately represent 22% of all cluster galaxies more massive than 3x10^10Msol, are mostly S0 galaxies, have a median effective radius <Re> =1.61+/-0.29kpc, a median Sersic index <n> = 3.0+/-0.6, and very old stellar populations with a median mass-weighted age of 12.1+/-1.3Gyr. We calculate a number density of 2.9x10^-2Mpc^-3 for superdense galaxies in local clusters, and a hard lower…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
