A multideterminant assessment of mean field methods for the description of electron transfer in the weak coupling regime
V. Geskin, R. Stadler, J. Cornil

TL;DR
This study evaluates the limitations of mean-field methods like Hartree Fock and DFT in accurately modeling electron transfer in weakly coupled systems, highlighting the importance of multideterminant approaches and spin-polarization effects.
Contribution
It demonstrates that standard mean-field methods fail to capture the step-like electron transfer behavior, and assesses the improvements from spin-unrestricted solutions compared to multideterminant benchmarks.
Findings
Closed-shell mean-field methods do not reproduce step-like electron transfer.
Spin-unrestricted Hartree Fock and DFT can qualitatively capture transfer steps.
Multideterminant calculations serve as benchmarks for assessing mean-field approximations.
Abstract
Multideterminant calculations have been performed on model systems to emphasize the role of many-body effects in the general description of charge quantization experiments. We show numerically and derive analytically that a closed-shell ansatz, the usual ingredient of mean-field methods, does not properly describe the step-like electron transfer characteristic in weakly coupled systems. With the multideterminant results as a benchmark, we have evaluated the performance of common ab initio mean field techniques, such as Hartree Fock (HF) and Density Functional Theory (DFT) with local and hybrid exchange correlation functionals, with a special focus on spin-polarization effects. For HF and hybrid DFT, a qualitatively correct open-shell solution with distinct steps in the electron transfer behaviour can be obtained with a spin-unrestricted (i.e., spin-polarized) ansatz though this solution…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
