Diagnostics of the structure of AGN's broad line regions with reverberation mapping data: confirmation of the two-component broad line region model

TL;DR

This study re-examines reverberation mapping data of AGN broad line regions, confirming a two-component model with distinct regions and velocities, refining radius measurements and resolving previous outliers on the R-L relationship.

Contribution

It provides empirical evidence supporting the two-component BLR model in AGNs using reverberation mapping data, clarifying the origin of broad emission lines.

Findings

Most sources are explained by a single Gaussian component, indicating a dominant VBLR.

Two sources show clear two-component profiles consistent with the model.

The two-component model explains the outlier NGC 4051 on the R-L relationship.

Abstract

We re-examine the ten Reverberation Mapping (RM) sources with public data based on the two-component model of the Broad Line Region (BLR). In fitting their broad H-beta lines, six of them only need one Gaussian component, one of them has a double-peak profile, one has an irregular profile, and only two of them need two components, i.e., a Very Broad Gaussian Component (VBGC) and an Inter-Mediate Gaussian Component (IMGC). The Gaussian components are assumed to come from two distinct regions in the two-component model; they are Very Broad Line Region (VBLR) and Inter-Mediate Line region (IMLR). The two sources with a two-component profile are Mrk 509 and NGC 4051. The time lags of the two components of both sources satisfy $t_{IMLR}/t_{VBLR}=V^2_{VBLR}/V^2_{IMLR}$, where $t_{IMLR}$ and $t_{VBLR}$ are the lags of the two components while $V_{IMLR}$ and $V_{VBLR}$ represent the mean gas velocities of the two regions, supporting the two-component model of the BLR of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN). The fact that most of these ten sources only have the VBGC confirms the assumption that RM mainly measures the radius of the VBLR; consequently, the radius obtained from the R-L relationship mainly represent the radius of VBLR. Moreover, NGC 4051, with a lag of about 5 days in the one component model, is an outlier on the R-L relationship as shown in Kaspi et al. (2005); however this problem disappears in our two-component model with lags of about 2 and 6 days for the VBGC and IMGC, respectively.