Comment on "On the Crooks fluctuation theorem and the Jarzynski equality" [J. Chem. Phys. 129, 091101 (2008)]
Artur B. Adib

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the validity of the Jarzynski equality and Crooks fluctuation theorem for Brownian processes, countering recent claims of violation by reaffirming their consistency under original definitions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the self-consistency condition between JE and CFT holds for Brownian processes when using original definitions.
Findings
JE and CFT are consistent for Brownian processes
Counteracts previous claims of violation
Reaffirms the original formulations' validity
Abstract
It has recently been argued that a self-consistency condition involving the Jarzynski equality (JE) and the Crooks fluctuation theorem (CFT) is violated for a simple Brownian process [L. Y. Chen, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 091101 (2008)]. This note adopts the definitions in the original formulation of the JE and CFT and demonstrates the contrary.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
