What can we really learn from positron flux 'anomalies'?

TL;DR

This paper critically examines cosmic ray positron and anti-proton data, providing simple models that align with observations and challenge claims of new primary sources, emphasizing the importance of secondary production in interpreting these measurements.

Contribution

It offers model-independent expressions for secondary positron and anti-proton fluxes, showing current data align with secondary production without requiring new sources.

Findings

Measurements are consistent with secondary production models.

No need for new primary sources to explain positron and anti-proton fluxes.

Constraints on cosmic ray propagation models from positron data.

Abstract

We present a critical analysis of the observational constraints on, and of the theoretical modeling of, aspects of cosmic ray (CR) generation and propagation in the Galaxy, which are relevant for the interpretation of recent positron and anti-proton measurements. We give simple, analytic, model independent expressions for the secondary pbar flux, and an upper limit for the secondary e+ flux, obtained by neglecting e+ radiative losses, e+/(e+ + e-)<0.2\pm0.1 up to ~300 GeV. These expressions are completely determined by the rigidity dependent grammage, which is measured from stable CR secondaries up to ~150 GeV/nuc, and by nuclear cross sections measured in the laboratory. pbar and e+ measurements, available up to ~100 GeV, are consistent with these estimates, implying that there is no need for new, non-secondary, pbar or e+ sources. The radiative loss suppression factor f_{s,e+} of the e+ flux depends on the e+ propagation in the Galaxy, which is not understood theoretically. A rough, model independent estimate of f_{s,e+} 1/3 can be obtained at a single energy, E\sim20 GeV, from unstable secondary decay and is found to be consistent with e+ measurements, including the positron fraction measured by PAMELA. We show that specific detailed models, that agree with compositional CR data, agree with our simple expressions for the e+ and pbar flux, and that the claims that the positron fraction measured by PAMELA requires new primary e+ sources are based on assumptions, that are not supported by observations. If PAMELA results are correct, they suggest that f_{s,e+} is slightly increasing with energy, which provides an interesting constraint on CR propagation models. We argue that measurements of the e+ to pbar ratio are more useful for challenging secondary production models than the positron fraction.