How to Evaluate Controlled Natural Languages
Tobias Kuhn

TL;DR
This paper introduces a framework for evaluating controlled natural languages through user experiments, demonstrated with Attempto Controlled English (ACE), to assess their effectiveness in understanding and classification tasks.
Contribution
It proposes a novel evaluation framework for controlled natural languages based on user classification tasks using ontographs, applied to ACE for validation.
Findings
Framework successfully applied to ACE
Users can classify statements with high accuracy
Provides a basis for comparing different controlled languages
Abstract
This paper presents a general framework how controlled natural languages can be evaluated and compared on the basis of user experiments. The subjects are asked to classify given statements (in the language to be tested) as either true or false with respect to a certain situation that is shown in a graphical notation called "ontographs". A first experiment has been conducted that applies this framework to the language Attempto Controlled English (ACE).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
