Thermo-refractive and thermo-chemical noise in the beamsplitter of GEO600 gravitational-wave interferometer
Bruin Benthem (Lorentz Institute), Yuri Levin (Leiden Observatory, and Lorentz Institute)

TL;DR
This paper presents a refined calculation of thermo-refractive noise in the GEO600 interferometer's beamsplitter, revealing a significant reduction in estimated noise and introducing a new thermo-chemical noise component that could impact detector sensitivity.
Contribution
The study provides an improved model of thermo-refractive noise considering beam profile and standing wave effects, and introduces the concept of thermo-chemical noise affecting gravitational-wave detectors.
Findings
Thermo-refractive noise amplitude is reduced by a factor of about 5.
Thermo-refractive fluctuations produce white noise between 600 Hz and 39 MHz.
A new thermo-chemical noise mechanism is proposed, caused by impurity motion along intensity gradients.
Abstract
Braginsky, Gorodetsky, and Vyatchanin have shown that thermo-refractive fluctuations are an important source of noise in interferometric gravitational-wave detectors. In particular, the thermo-refractive noise in the GEO600 beamsplitter is expected to make a substantial contribution to the interferometer's total noise budget. Here we present a new computation of the GEO600 thermo-refractive noise which takes into account the beam's elliptical profile and, more importantly, the fact that the laser beam induces a standing electromagnetic wave in the beamsplitter. The use of updated parameters results in the overall reduction of the calculated noise amplitude by a factor of about 5 in the low-frequency part of the GEO600 band, compared to the previous estimates. We also find, by contrast with previous calculations, that thermo-refractive fluctuations result in white noise between 600 Hz…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
