Testing the Realistic Seesaw Model with Two Heavy Majorana Neutrinos at the CERN Large Hadron Collider
Wei Chao, Zong-guo Si, Ya-juan Zheng, and Shun Zhou

TL;DR
This paper proposes a flavor symmetry-based scenario within the seesaw model where heavy Majorana neutrinos produce detectable lepton-number-violating signals at the LHC, with distinctive interference effects and potential to differentiate from other new physics signals.
Contribution
It introduces a novel seesaw scenario with structural cancellation due to flavor symmetry, leading to observable collider signatures of heavy Majorana neutrinos.
Findings
Heavy Majorana neutrinos can produce detectable same-sign dilepton signals at the LHC.
Interference effects between two heavy neutrinos significantly impact the collider signatures.
The scenario allows distinguishing signals from heavy neutrinos versus doubly-charged Higgs bosons.
Abstract
In the conventional type-(I+II) seesaw model, the effective mass matrix of three known light neutrinos is given by M_nu = M_L - M_D M^{-1}_R M^T_D in the leading-order approximation. We propose an intriguing scenario, in which the structural cancellation condition M_D M^{-1}_R M^T_D = 0 is guaranteed by the A_4 x Z_2 flavor symmetry. As a consequence, neutrino masses are mainly generated by the Higgs triplet M_nu = M_L, while the neutrino mixing matrix is non-unitary and takes on the nearly tri-bimaximal pattern. A discriminating feature of this scenario from the pure type-II seesaw model is that the lepton-number-violating signatures induced by the heavy Majorana neutrinos can be discovered at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. We calculate the total cross section of the same-sign dilepton events pp to l^+(-)_alpha N_i to l^+(-)_alpha l^+(-)_beta jj (for i=1, 2 and alpha, beta = e, mu,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
