Comment on `Do we have a consistent non-adiabatic quantum-classical mechanics?'
Vladimir V. Kisil

TL;DR
This paper critically examines claims about a quantum-classical bracket, arguing that it does not produce artificial coupling and clarifies its classical and quantum features.
Contribution
It provides a detailed critique of previous assertions regarding the quantum-classical bracket, defending its validity and classical nature.
Findings
The quantum-classical bracket does not generate artificial coupling.
The bracket maintains a consistent semi-classical structure.
Clarifies the classical and quantum aspects of p-mechanics.
Abstract
We argue with claims of the paper [Agostini F., Caprara S. and Ciccotti G., Europhys. Lett. EPL, 78 (2007) Art. 30001, 6] that the quantum-classic bracket introduced in [arXiv:quant-ph/0506122] produces "artificial coupling" and has "genuinely classical nature". Keywords: p-mechanics, quantum, classic, commutator, Poisson bracket, mixing, coupling, semi-classical
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
