On the complexity of deciding whether the distinguishing chromatic number of a graph is at most two
Elaine M. Eschen, Chinh T. Hoang, R. Sritharan, Lorna Stewart

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of determining whether a graph's distinguishing chromatic number is at most two, revealing it is as hard as graph automorphism but not harder than graph isomorphism.
Contribution
It establishes the complexity bounds for the k=2 case, filling a gap in understanding the problem's difficulty for small k.
Findings
Deciding if the distinguishing chromatic number ≤ 2 is as hard as graph automorphism.
The problem is no harder than graph isomorphism.
For k ≥ 3, the problem is NP-hard, but for k=2, it has a complexity bound between automorphism and isomorphism.
Abstract
In an article [3] published recently in this journal, it was shown that when k >= 3, the problem of deciding whether the distinguishing chromatic number of a graph is at most k is NP-hard. We consider the problem when k = 2. In regards to the issue of solvability in polynomial time, we show that the problem is at least as hard as graph automorphism but no harder than graph isomorphism.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGraph Labeling and Dimension Problems · graph theory and CDMA systems · Advanced Graph Theory Research
