A Test of Star Formation Laws in Disk Galaxies
Jonathan C. Tan (University of Florida)

TL;DR
This study tests various star formation laws against observations of 12 disk galaxies, finding that the GMC collision law best explains the full range of star formation activity with minimal adjustments.
Contribution
It compares multiple star formation laws using detailed galactic observations and identifies the GMC collision law as the most accurate across diverse galaxy environments.
Findings
Constant molecular law and KMT turbulence law are also accurate.
GMC collision law fits data without changing physics.
Single GMC collision law with B_CC=8.0x10^{-3} explains star formation across galaxies.
Abstract
We use observations of the radial profiles of the mass surface density of total, Sigma_g, and molecular, Sigma_H2, gas, rotation velocity and star formation rate surface density, Sigma_sfr, of the molecular dominated regions of 12 disk galaxies from Leroy et al. to test several star formation laws: a "Kennicutt-Schmidt power law", Sigma_sfr=A_g Sigma_{g,2}^{1.5}$; a "Constant molecular law", Sigma_sfr = A_H2 Sigma_{H2,2}; the "Turbulence-regulated laws" of Krumholz & McKee (KM) and Krumholz, McKee & Tumlinson (KMT), a "Gas-Omega law", Sigma_sfr = B_Omega Sigma_g Omega; and a shear-driven "GMC collisions law", Sigma_sfr = B_CC Sigma_g Omega (1 - 0.7beta), where beta is d ln v_circ / d ln r. We find the constant molecular law, KMT turbulence law and GMC collision law are the most accurate, with an rms error of a factor of 1.5 if the normalization constants are allowed to vary between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
