Tracking the impact of environment on the Galaxy Stellar Mass Function up to z~1 in the 10k zCOSMOS sample
M. Bolzonella, K. Kovac, L. Pozzetti, E. Zucca, O. Cucciati, S.J., Lilly, Y. Peng, A. Iovino, G. Zamorani, D. Vergani, L.A.M. Tasca, F., Lamareille, P. Oesch, K. Caputi, P. Kampczyk, S. Bardelli, C. Maier, U., Abbas, C. Knobel, M. Scodeggio, C.M. Carollo, T. Contini, J.-P. Kneib

TL;DR
This study investigates how environmental density influences the evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function from redshift 1 to the present, revealing significant differences in galaxy properties and mass distributions based on environment.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the environmental dependence of the galaxy stellar mass function evolution up to z~1 using the zCOSMOS 10k sample, including comparisons with semi-analytical models.
Findings
GSMF shape varies with environment, especially at lower redshifts.
High-density regions show a bimodal GSMF at z~1.
Models overpredict blue galaxies in sparse environments and overquench red galaxies in dense environments.
Abstract
We study the impact of the environment on the evolution of galaxies in the zCOSMOS 10k sample in the redshift range 0.1<z<1.0 over an area of ~1.5 deg2. The considered sample of secure spectroscopic redshifts contains about 8500 galaxies, with their stellar masses estimated by SED fitting of the multiwavelength optical to NIR photometry. The evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function (GSMF) in high and low density regions provides a tool to study the mass assembly evolution in different environments; moreover, the contributions to the GSMF from different galaxy types, as defined by their SEDs and their morphologies, can be quantified. At redshift z~1, the GSMF is only slightly dependent on environment, but at lower redshifts the shapes of the GSMFs in high- and low-density environments become extremely different, with high density regions exhibiting a marked bimodality. As a result,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
