General combination rules for qualitative and quantitative beliefs
Arnaud Martin (E3I2), Christophe Osswald (E3I2), Jean Dezert (ONERA),, Florentin Smarandache (UNM)

TL;DR
This paper introduces new combination rules for merging both qualitative and quantitative beliefs, enhancing conflict management and specificity considerations in belief fusion.
Contribution
It proposes novel fusion rules capable of handling both qualitative and quantitative beliefs within a unified framework.
Findings
New combination rules for qualitative and quantitative beliefs
Framework effectively manages conflict and specificity
Applicable to expert opinion and natural language beliefs
Abstract
Martin and Osswald \cite{Martin07} have recently proposed many generalizations of combination rules on quantitative beliefs in order to manage the conflict and to consider the specificity of the responses of the experts. Since the experts express themselves usually in natural language with linguistic labels, Smarandache and Dezert \cite{Li07} have introduced a mathematical framework for dealing directly also with qualitative beliefs. In this paper we recall some element of our previous works and propose the new combination rules, developed for the fusion of both qualitative or quantitative beliefs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRough Sets and Fuzzy Logic · Multi-Criteria Decision Making
