Comparing and Aggregating Partially Resolved Trees
Mukul S. Bansal, Jianrong Dong, David Fern\'andez-Baca

TL;DR
This paper introduces efficient algorithms for measuring similarities between phylogenetic trees, effectively handling unresolved nodes by using triplet and quartet-based distances with parametric and Hausdorff approaches.
Contribution
It presents novel distance measures for rooted and unrooted trees that accommodate unresolved nodes, improving robustness and granularity over traditional methods.
Findings
Effective handling of unresolved nodes in phylogenetic trees.
Introduction of parametric and Hausdorff distance measures.
Algorithms demonstrating computational efficiency.
Abstract
We define, analyze, and give efficient algorithms for two kinds of distance measures for rooted and unrooted phylogenies. For rooted trees, our measures are based on the topologies the input trees induce on triplets; that is, on three-element subsets of the set of species. For unrooted trees, the measures are based on quartets (four-element subsets). Triplet and quartet-based distances provide a robust and fine-grained measure of the similarities between trees. The distinguishing feature of our distance measures relative to traditional quartet and triplet distances is their ability to deal cleanly with the presence of unresolved nodes, also called polytomies. For rooted trees, these are nodes with more than two children; for unrooted trees, they are nodes of degree greater than three. Our first class of measures are parametric distances, where there is a parameter that weighs the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Data Management and Algorithms
