Radio Planetary Nebulae in the Magellanic Clouds
M. D. Filipovi\'c, M. Cohen, W. A. Reid, J. L. Payne, Q. A. Parker, E., J. Crawford, I. S. Boji\v{c}i\'c, A. Y. De Horta, A. Hughes, J. Dickel, F., Stootman

TL;DR
This study reports the detection of 15 planetary nebulae in the Magellanic Clouds via radio observations, revealing unusually high flux densities and suggesting these objects may be in different evolutionary stages, aiding understanding of their mass-loss processes.
Contribution
First extragalactic radio detections of Magellanic Cloud PNe, identifying unusually luminous radio sources and proposing a new 'Super PNe' category for high-flux objects.
Findings
One SMC PN has a flux density of 5.1 mJy at 1.4 GHz.
Detected PNe show a wide range of optical sizes and flux densities.
Some PNe may represent the upper limit of radio luminosity.
Abstract
We report the extragalactic radio-continuum detection of 15 planetary nebulae (PNe) in the Magellanic Clouds (MCs) from recent Australia Telescope Compact Array+Parkes mosaic surveys. These detections were supplemented by new and high resolution radio, optical and IR observations which helped to resolve the true nature of the objects. Four of the PNe are located in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) and 11 are located in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). Based on Galactic PNe the expected radio flux densities at the distance of the LMC/SMC are up to ~2.5 mJy and ~2.0 mJy at 1.4 GHz, respectively. We find that one of our new radio PNe in the SMC has a flux density of 5.1 mJy at 1.4 GHz, several times higher than expected. We suggest that the most luminous radio PN in the SMC (N S68) may represent the upper limit to radio peak luminosity because it is ~3 times more luminous than NGC 7027,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
