The zCOSMOS Redshift Survey: the role of environment and stellar mass in shaping the rise of the morphology-density relation from z~1
L.A.M. Tasca, J.P. Kneib, A. Iovino, O. Le Fevre, K. Kovac, M., Bolzonella, S.J. Lilly, R. G. Abraham, P. Cassata, O. Cucciati, L. Guzzo, L., Tresse, G. Zamorani, P. Capak, B. Garilli, M. Scodeggio, K. Sheth, D., Vergani, E. Zucca, C. M. Carollo, T. Contini, V. Mainieri

TL;DR
This study investigates how the relationship between galaxy morphology and environment has evolved up to redshift z~1, revealing the roles of stellar mass and galaxy color in this evolution using extensive spectroscopic and imaging data.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the evolution of the morphology-density relation up to z~1, incorporating galaxy stellar mass, luminosity, and color dependencies with a large, well-characterized dataset.
Findings
Morphology-density relation evolves significantly from z~1 to present.
Stellar mass influences galaxy morphology more than environment alone.
Color and morphology segregation depend on galaxy mass and environment.
Abstract
For more than two decades we have known that galaxy morphological segregation is present in the Local Universe. It is important to see how this relation evolves with cosmic time. To investigate how galaxy assembly took place with cosmic time, we explore the evolution of the morphology-density relation up to redshift z~1 using about 10000 galaxies drawn from the zCOSMOS Galaxy Redshift Survey. Taking advantage of accurate HST/ACS morphologies from the COSMOS survey, of the well-characterised zCOSMOS 3D environment, and of a large sample of galaxies with spectroscopic redshift, we want to study here the evolution of the morphology-density relation up to z~1 and its dependence on galaxy luminosity and stellar mass. The multi-wavelength coverage of the field also allows a first study of the galaxy morphological segregation dependence on colour. We further attempt to disentangle between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
