Witnessing the assembly at z=1.6 of a galaxy cluster (GMASS ultradeep spectroscopy of galaxies at z~2 - V)
J. Kurk (MPIA, OAA), A. Cimatti, G. Zamorani, C. Halliday, M. Mignoli,, L. Pozzetti, E. Daddi, P. Rosati, M. Dickinson, M. Bolzonella, P. Cassata, A., Renzini, A. Franceschini, G. Rodighiero, S. Berta

TL;DR
This study identifies and characterizes a galaxy overdensity at z=1.6, revealing its structure, galaxy properties, and potential evolution into a galaxy cluster, based on deep spectroscopic survey data.
Contribution
First detailed spectroscopic analysis of a galaxy overdensity at z=1.6, linking galaxy properties to hierarchical formation models and predicting future cluster evolution.
Findings
Overdensity contains 42 galaxies with velocity dispersion of 500 km/s.
Members show 50% lower star formation rates than field galaxies.
Presence of passively evolving, massive galaxies consistent with a red sequence.
Abstract
We present a study of a galaxy overdensity at z=1.6, Cl 0332-2742, uncovered in the Galaxy Mass Assembly ultra-deep Spectroscopic Survey (GMASS). We conservatively estimate the overdensity in redshift space for the spike, containing 42 galaxies at z=1.6, to be 8.3+/-1.5 and find a velocity dispersion of 500 km/s. A map of the surface density of galaxies at z=1.6 in the GMASS field shows that its structure is irregular. The differences in the physical properties of Cl 0332-2742 member and field galaxies agree with the latest hierarchical galaxy formation models: for overdensity members, the star formation rate (SFR), and specific SFR, is approximately 50% lower than for the field galaxies; overdensity galaxies are twice the age, on average, of field galaxies; and there is a higher proportion of both massive (M>10^{10.7} M_sol), and early-type galaxies, inside Cl 0332-2742 than in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
