On the Definition of Non-deterministic Mechanisms
Venkata Rao Kuchibhotla, Viswanath Kasturi

TL;DR
This paper introduces three equivalent mathematical definitions of non-deterministic mechanisms, providing a clearer and more accessible way to understand and teach the concept, with implications for formal methods like Dijkstra's wp-formalism.
Contribution
It presents three new approaches to defining non-deterministic mechanisms and proves their equivalence, offering a simplified perspective for formal methods.
Findings
All three definitions are mathematically equivalent.
The new approaches facilitate easier understanding and teaching.
Implications for the wp-formalism of Dijkstra.
Abstract
We present here three different approaches to the problem of modeling mathematically the concept of a non-deterministic mechanism. Each of these three approaches leads to a mathematical definition. We then show that all the three mathematical concepts are equivalent to one another. This insight gives us the option of approaching the wp-formalism of Dijkstra from a different viewpoint that is easier to understand and to teach.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics · Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies
