Characterization of the BICEP Telescope for High-Precision Cosmic Microwave Background Polarimetry
Y. D. Takahashi, P. A. R. Ade, D. Barkats, J. O. Battle, E. M., Bierman, J. J. Bock, H. C. Chiang, C. D. Dowell, L. Duband, E. F. Hivon, W., L. Holzapfel, V. V. Hristov, W. C. Jones, B. G. Keating, J. M. Kovac, C. L., Kuo, A. E. Lange, E. M. Leitch, P. V. Mason, T. Matsumura

TL;DR
The paper details the comprehensive characterization of the BICEP telescope's systematic errors to ensure precise measurement of the faint inflationary B-mode polarization in the CMB, supporting its goal to detect primordial gravitational waves.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis and benchmarking of instrumental systematic errors for BICEP, demonstrating adequate characterization to achieve its scientific objectives.
Findings
Systematic errors are well-characterized and controlled.
Instrumental benchmarks meet the requirements for BICEP's measurements.
Future refinements are identified for probing lower tensor-to-scalar ratios.
Abstract
The BICEP experiment was designed specifically to search for the signature of inflationary gravitational waves in the polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Using a novel small-aperture refractor and 49 pairs of polarization-sensitive bolometers, BICEP has completed 3 years of successful observations at the South Pole beginning in 2006 February. To constrain the amplitude of the inflationary B-mode polarization, which is expected to be at least 7 orders of magnitude fainter than the 3 K CMB intensity, precise control of systematic effects is essential. This paper describes the characterization of potential systematic errors for the BICEP experiment, supplementing a companion paper on the initial cosmological results. Using the analysis pipelines for the experiment, we have simulated the impact of systematic errors on the B-mode polarization measurement. Guided by these…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
