Computational Processes and Incompleteness
Klaus Sutner

TL;DR
This paper formalizes Wolfram's concept of computational processes using cellular automata, classifies them into decidable, intermediate, and complete, and demonstrates the non-existence of intermediate processes within a specific computational framework.
Contribution
It introduces a formal definition of cellular automata-based computational processes and proves the non-existence of intermediate processes in finite injury priority arguments.
Findings
Classifies cellular automata processes into decidable, intermediate, and complete.
Shows that intermediate processes cannot be established within standard finite injury priority arguments.
Provides a formal framework connecting Wolfram's notions with classical computability theory.
Abstract
We introduce a formal definition of Wolfram's notion of computational process based on cellular automata, a physics-like model of computation. There is a natural classification of these processes into decidable, intermediate and complete. It is shown that in the context of standard finite injury priority arguments one cannot establish the existence of an intermediate computational process.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Cellular Automata and Applications · semigroups and automata theory
