Non variability of intervening absorbers observed in the UVES spectra of the "naked-eye" GRB080319

TL;DR

This study uses high-resolution, multi-epoch spectra of GRB080319B to analyze intervening absorbers, finding no variability in their properties and confirming an excess of strong MgII absorbers compared to quasars.

Contribution

It provides the first multi-epoch, high-resolution spectroscopic analysis of intervening absorbers in a GRB afterglow, demonstrating their non-variability and addressing the MgII absorber excess issue.

Findings

No significant variability in absorber column densities over time.

Confirmed excess of strong MgII absorbers compared to quasars.

Rejection of the hypothesis that absorber differences are due to emitting region size.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the properties of the intervening absorbers lying along the line of sight of Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) 080319B through the analysis of its optical absorption features. To this purpose, we analyze a multi-epoch, high resolution spectroscopic observations (R=40000, corresponding to 7.5 km/s) of the optical afterglow of GRB080319B (z=0.937), taken with UVES at the VLT. Thanks to the rapid response mode (RRM), we observed the afterglow just 8m:30s after the GRB onset when the magnitude was R ~ 12. This allowed us to obtain the best signal-to-noise, high resolution spectrum of a GRB afterglow ever (S/N per resolution element ~ 50). Two further RRM and target of opportunity observations were obtained starting 1.0 and 2.4 hours after the event, respectively. Four MgII absorption systems lying along the line of sight to the afterglow have been detected in the redshift range 0.5 < z < 0.8, most of them showing a complex structure featuring several components. Absorptions due to FeII, MgI and MnII are also present; they appear in four, two and one intervening absorbers, respectively. One out of four systems show a MgII2796 rest frame equivalent width larger than 1A. This confirms the excess of strong MgII absorbers compared to quasars, with dn/dz = 0.9, ~ 4 times larger than the one observed along quasar lines of sight. In addition, the analysis of multi-epoch, high-resolution spectra allowed us to exclude a significant variability in the column density of the single components of each absorber. Combining this result with estimates of the size of the emitting region, we can reject the hypothesis that the difference between GRB and QSO MgII absorbers is due to a different size of the emitting regions.