Charges of Monopole Operators in Chern-Simons Yang-Mills Theory
Marcus K. Benna, Igor R. Klebanov, Thomas Klose

TL;DR
This paper calculates the exact non-abelian R-charges of monopole operators in N=3 supersymmetric Chern-Simons Yang-Mills theories, including ABJM, revealing their role in spectrum matching and supersymmetry enhancement.
Contribution
It provides a one-loop exact computation of monopole R-charges in N=3 theories, applicable at all couplings, and demonstrates the existence of monopole operators with zero scaling dimension in ABJM.
Findings
Monopole operators have quantized SU(2)_R charges related to Wess-Zumino terms.
In ABJM theory, the relevant Wess-Zumino coefficient h=0, indicating monopole operators with zero dimension.
Existence of monopole operators as singlets under all global symmetries supports spectrum matching with supergravity.
Abstract
We calculate the non-abelian R-charges of BPS monopole operators in three-dimensional gauge theories with N=3 supersymmetry. This class of models includes ABJM theory, the proposed gauge theory dual of M-theory on AdS_4 x S^7/Z_k, as a special case. In the UV limit of the N=3 theories the Yang-Mills coupling becomes weak and the monopole operators are described by classical backgrounds. This allows us to find their SU(2)_R charges in a one-loop computation which by virtue of the non-renormalization of non-abelian R-charges yields the exact result for any value of the coupling. The spectrum of SU(2)_R charges is found by quantizing the SU(2)/U(1) collective coordinate of the BPS background, whose dynamics is that of a charged particle on a sphere with a Wess-Zumino term representing a magnetic monopole at its center. If the Wess-Zumino coefficient is h, then the smallest possible SU(2)_R…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
