A formal proof of the Born rule from decision-theoretic assumptions
David Wallace

TL;DR
This paper provides a rigorous mathematical proof of the Born rule in Everettian quantum mechanics using decision-theoretic assumptions, clarifying the foundational link between quantum probability and decision theory.
Contribution
It formalizes and rigorously proves the decision-theoretic derivation of the Born rule within the Everett interpretation, addressing previous informal arguments.
Findings
The proof confirms the validity of the Born rule under specified decision-theoretic premises.
Counter-examples are analyzed to show which assumptions they violate.
The approach strengthens the theoretical foundation of quantum probability in many-worlds interpretation.
Abstract
I develop the decision-theoretic approach to quantum probability, originally proposed by David Deutsch, into a mathematically rigorous proof of the Born rule in (Everett-interpreted) quantum mechanics. I sketch the argument informally, then prove it formally, and lastly consider a number of proposed ``counter-examples'' to show exactly which premises of the argument they violate.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
