ABJ(M) and Fractional M2's with Fractional M2 Charge
Jarah Evslin, Stanislav Kuperstein

TL;DR
This paper explores conditions under which N=3 supersymmetric vacua can exist in ABJ(M) theories, proposing weaker constraints than previously thought, and relates these to cascading gauge theories and brane configurations.
Contribution
It introduces a braneology argument showing N=3 supersymmetry preservation under weaker conditions and connects these vacua to cascading gauge theories with fractional M2-brane charge.
Findings
N=3 vacua can exist with less restrictive conditions than N=6 cases.
Cascading gauge theories are represented by specific brane configurations.
M2-brane charge runs due to twisted Bianchi identities, M5-brane charge involves torsion homology cycles.
Abstract
Recently Aharony, Bergman and Jafferis (ABJ) have argued that a 3d U(N+M)xU(N) Chern-Simons gauge theory at level (k,-k) may have a vacuum with N=6 supersymmetry only if M<k+1 and if a certain period of the B-field in a IIA background is quantized. We use a braneology argument to argue that N=3 supersymmetry may be preserved under the weaker condition that 2Nk>M(M-k)-1 with no restriction on the B-field. IIB brane cartoons and 11d supergravity solutions corresponding to N=3 vacua that do not preserve N=6 supersymmetry are argued to represent cascading gauge theories, generalizing the N=2 Seiberg duality conjectured by Giveon and Kutasov. While as usual the M2-brane charge runs as a result of the twisted Bianchi identity for *G_4, the M5-brane charge running relies on the fact that it wraps a torsion homology cycle.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
