Counterexamples for interpolation of compact Lipschitz operators
Michael Cwikel, Alon Ivtsan

TL;DR
This paper constructs examples demonstrating that the interpolation of compact Lipschitz operators between Banach couples does not always preserve compactness, contrasting with the linear case.
Contribution
It provides counterexamples showing that the compactness of Lipschitz operators is not necessarily maintained under interpolation.
Findings
Counterexamples show non-compactness in general
Interpolation does not always preserve compactness for Lipschitz operators
Contrast with linear case where compactness is preserved
Abstract
Let (A_0,A_1) and (B_0,B_1) be Banach couples with A_0 contained in A_1 and B_0 contained in B_1. Let T:A_1 --> B_1 be a possibly nonlinear operator which is a compact Lipschitz map of A_j into B_j for j=0,1. It is known that T maps the Lions-Peetre space (A_0,A_1)_\theta,q boundedly into (B_0,B_1)_\theta,q for each \theta in (0,1) and each q in [1,\infty), and that this map is also compact if if T is linear. We present examples which show that in general the map T:(A_0,A_1)_\theta,q --> (B_0,B_1)_\theta,q is not compact.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Harmonic Analysis Research · Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods · Numerical methods in inverse problems
