Ideal Stabilization
Mikhail Nesterenko, S\'ebastien Tixeuil (LIP6)

TL;DR
This paper introduces the concept of ideal stabilization, where every system state is legitimate, enabling precise recovery specifications and analyzing conditions for ideal stabilization in various distributed algorithms.
Contribution
It formally defines ideal stabilization, establishes necessary conditions, and demonstrates its application by proving several well-known protocols are ideally stabilizing.
Findings
No ideally stabilizing solution for leader election.
Proved ideal stabilization for conflict manager, alternator, feedback propagation, and alternating bit protocol.
Abstract
We define and explore the concept of ideal stabilization. The program is ideally stabilizing if its every state is legitimate. Ideal stabilization allows the specification designer to prescribe with arbitrary degree of precision not only the fault-free program behavior but also its recovery operation. Specifications may or may not mention all possible states. We identify approaches to designing ideal stabilization to both kinds of specifications. For the first kind, we state the necessary condition for an ideally stabilizing solution. On the basis of this condition we prove that there is no ideally stabilizing solution to the leader election problem. We illustrate the utility of the concept by providing examples of well-known programs and proving them ideally stabilizing. Specifically, we prove ideal stabilization of the conflict manager, the alternator, the propagation of information…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDistributed systems and fault tolerance · Security and Verification in Computing · Real-Time Systems Scheduling
