Telescope Time Without Tears: A Distributed Approach to Peer Review
Michael R. Merrifield (1), Donald G. Saari (2) ((1) University of, Nottingham, School of Physics & Astronomy,(2) University of California, Irvine, Institute of Mathematical Behavioral Sciences)

TL;DR
This paper proposes a distributed peer review system for telescope time allocation, aiming to reduce the burden on committees and improve fairness by leveraging community consensus.
Contribution
It introduces a novel distributed peer review mechanism that decentralizes telescope time allocation, addressing scalability and fairness issues in traditional processes.
Findings
Reduces reviewer burden significantly.
Aligns awarded projects with community consensus.
Potential to improve fairness and efficiency.
Abstract
The procedure that is currently employed to allocate time on telescopes is horribly onerous on those unfortunate astronomers who serve on the committees that administer the process, and is in danger of complete collapse as the number of applications steadily increases. Here, an alternative is presented, whereby the task is distributed around the astronomical community, with a suitable mechanism design established to steer the outcome toward awarding this precious resource to those projects where there is a consensus across the community that the science is most exciting and innovative.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
