Priors in quantum Bayesian inference
Christopher A. Fuchs, Ruediger Schack

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that in quantum Bayesian inference, the choice of prior remains crucial even with infinite measurement data, affecting conclusions significantly as shown through various examples.
Contribution
It reveals the persistent importance of priors in quantum Bayesian inference, challenging the assumption that data alone suffices with infinite measurements.
Findings
Prior influences conclusions even with infinite data
Different priors can lead to divergent inferences
Examples illustrate the ongoing role of priors in quantum inference
Abstract
In quantum Bayesian inference problems, any conclusions drawn from a finite number of measurements depend not only on the outcomes of the measurements but also on a prior. Here we show that, in general, the prior remains important even in the limit of an infinite number of measurements. We illustrate this point with several examples where two priors lead to very different conclusions given the same measurement data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
