Power spectrum analysis with least-squares fitting: Amplitude bias and its elimination, with application to optical tweezers and atomic force microscope cantilevers
Simon F. Norrelykke, Henrik Flyvbjerg

TL;DR
This paper identifies a bias in least-squares fitting of power spectra for optical tweezers and AFM cantilevers, quantifies it analytically, and provides a simple correction method applicable to various systems with linear dynamics.
Contribution
It analytically characterizes the bias in weighted least-squares power spectrum fitting and offers a straightforward correction applicable across multiple scientific fields.
Findings
Bias ranges from -2/n to +1/n depending on weighting scheme
Characteristic frequency estimates are unaffected by the bias
Bias can be easily corrected with minimal modifications to fitting programs
Abstract
Optical tweezers and AFM cantilevers are often calibrated by fitting their experimental powerspectra of Brownian motion. We demonstrate here that if this is done with typical weighted least-squares methods the result is a bias of relative size between -2/n and +1/n on the value of the fitted diffusion coefficient. Here n is the number of power-spectra averaged over, so typical calibrations contain 10-20% bias. Both the sign and the size of the bias depends on the weighting scheme applied. Hence, so do length-scale calibrations based on the diffusion coefficient. The fitted value for the characteristic frequency is not affected by this bias. For the AFM then, force measurements are not affected provided an independent length-scale calibration is available. For optical-tweezers there is no such luck, since the spring constant is found as the ratio of the characteristic frequency and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
