Nonseparable UHF algebras I: Dixmier's problem
Ilijas Farah, Takeshi Katsura

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether the three classical definitions of UHF C*-algebras are equivalent in the nonseparable case, providing a complete answer with specific counterexamples and positive results within ZFC set theory.
Contribution
It establishes the conditions under which the definitions are equivalent or not in nonseparable UHF algebras, resolving Dixmier's longstanding problem.
Findings
Two definitions are equivalent in small cardinality cases.
Counterexamples show non-equivalence in other cases.
Results are obtained within standard set theory (ZFC).
Abstract
There are three natural ways to define UHF (uniformly hyperfinite) C*-algebras, and all three definitions are equivalent for separable algebras. In 1967 Dixmier asked whether the three definitions remain equivalent for not necessarily separable algebras. We give a complete answer to this question. More precisely, we show that in small cardinality two definitions remain equivalent, and give counterexamples in other cases. Our results do not use any additional set-theoretic axioms beyond the usual axioms, namely ZFC.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Operator Algebra Research · Advanced Banach Space Theory · Advanced Topics in Algebra
