Radius determination of solar-type stars using asteroseismology: What to expect from the Kepler mission
D. Stello, W. J. Chaplin, H. Bruntt, O. L. Creevey, A., Garc\'ia-Hern\'andez, M. J. P. F. G. Monteiro, A. Moya, P.-O. Quirion, S. G., Sousa, J.-C. Su\'arez, T. Appourchaux, T. Arentoft, J. Ballot, T. R. Bedding,, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, Y. Elsworth, S. T. Fletcher

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that asteroseismology, combined with Kepler data, can accurately determine the radii of solar-type stars to within 3%, significantly improving over traditional methods and aiding exoplanet characterization.
Contribution
The paper shows that stellar radii can be precisely measured using asteroseismic data from Kepler, achieving better accuracy than non-seismic methods, validated through simulation exercises.
Findings
Stellar radii can be determined within 3% accuracy using asteroseismology.
Asteroseismic methods outperform traditional techniques by a factor of 5-10 in radius estimation.
Automatic pipelines can reliably estimate stellar radii for Kepler data.
Abstract
For distant stars, as observed by the NASA Kepler satellite, parallax information is currently of fairly low quality and is not complete. This limits the precision with which the absolute sizes of the stars and their potential transiting planets can be determined by traditional methods. Asteroseismology will be used to aid the radius determination of stars observed during NASA's Kepler mission. We report on the recent asteroFLAG hare-and-hounds Exercise#2, where a group of `hares' simulated data of F-K main-sequence stars that a group of `hounds' sought to analyze, aimed at determining the stellar radii. Based on the asteroseismic large frequency spacing, obtained from simulations of 4-year time series data from the Kepler mission, we demonstrate that the stellar radii can be correctly and precisely determined, when combined with traditional stellar parameters from the Kepler Input…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
