Residual noise covariance for Planck low-resolution data analysis
R. Keskitalo, M.A.J. Ashdown, P. Cabella, T. Kisner, T. Poutanen, R., Stompor, J.G. Bartlett, J. Borrill, C. Cantalupo, G. de Gasperis, A. de Rosa,, G. de Troia, H.K. Eriksen, F. Finelli, K.M. Gorski, A. Gruppuso, E. Hivon, A., Jaffe, E. Keihanen, H. Kurki-Suonio, C.R. Lawrence

TL;DR
This paper develops analytical tools and validation methods to estimate residual noise covariance in Planck low-resolution maps, crucial for accurate large-scale anisotropy analysis.
Contribution
It introduces a method to compute and validate residual noise covariance matrices for Planck low-resolution maps, improving noise characterization accuracy.
Findings
Excellent agreement between analytical covariance matrices and Monte Carlo simulations.
Destriping map-makers' noise agreement depends on knee frequency and baseline length.
Proper window functions are essential to minimize aliasing in resolution downgrading.
Abstract
Aims: Develop and validate tools to estimate residual noise covariance in Planck frequency maps. Quantify signal error effects and compare different techniques to produce low-resolution maps. Methods: We derive analytical estimates of covariance of the residual noise contained in low-resolution maps produced using a number of map-making approaches. We test these analytical predictions using Monte Carlo simulations and their impact on angular power spectrum estimation. We use simulations to quantify the level of signal errors incurred in different resolution downgrading schemes considered in this work. Results: We find an excellent agreement between the optimal residual noise covariance matrices and Monte Carlo noise maps. For destriping map-makers, the extent of agreement is dictated by the knee frequency of the correlated noise component and the chosen baseline offset length. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
