Schwarzschild manifold and non-regular coordinate transformations (A critico-historical Note)
Angelo Loinger, Tiziana Marsico

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the Schwarzschild manifold's metrics, emphasizing that only Schwarzschild's original and Brillouin's solutions accurately represent the physical gravity field of a point mass, unlike other extended metrics.
Contribution
It clarifies the physical validity of specific Schwarzschild solutions and critiques non-regular coordinate transformations in the context of gravitational fields.
Findings
Schwarzschild's original and Brillouin's solutions are physically adequate.
Other maximally extended metrics do not faithfully represent the gravity field.
The analysis highlights the importance of coordinate choice in gravitational solutions.
Abstract
A careful analysis of the maximally extended metrics of Schwarzschild manifold shows that the original Schwarzschild's solution (1916) and Brillouin's solution (1923) are the only ones that are adequate from the physical standpoint. Contrary to the other maximally extended metrics, they represent faithfully the gravity field created by the mass-point.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeophysics and Sensor Technology · Relativity and Gravitational Theory · Planetary Science and Exploration
