Topics in Compressed Sensing
Deanna Needell

TL;DR
This paper reviews two main approaches in compressed sensing—L1-minimization and greedy algorithms—and introduces ROMP and CoSaMP, which combine efficiency with strong recovery guarantees.
Contribution
It presents the development and analysis of the ROMP and CoSaMP algorithms, bridging the gap between speed and theoretical guarantees in sparse signal recovery.
Findings
ROMP offers guarantees similar to L1-minimization with faster computation.
CoSaMP improves upon ROMP, achieving optimal recovery guarantees.
Both algorithms outperform traditional greedy methods in accuracy and efficiency.
Abstract
Compressed sensing has a wide range of applications that include error correction, imaging, radar and many more. Given a sparse signal in a high dimensional space, one wishes to reconstruct that signal accurately and efficiently from a number of linear measurements much less than its actual dimension. Although in theory it is clear that this is possible, the difficulty lies in the construction of algorithms that perform the recovery efficiently, as well as determining which kind of linear measurements allow for the reconstruction. There have been two distinct major approaches to sparse recovery that each present different benefits and shortcomings. The first, L1-minimization methods such as Basis Pursuit, use a linear optimization problem to recover the signal. This method provides strong guarantees and stability, but relies on Linear Programming, whose methods do not yet have strong…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications · Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
