Proposition d'une methode de qualification et de selection d'un logiciel d'analyse et de suivi du referencement dans les moteurs de recherche
Sebastien Bruyere, Vincent Pillet, Luc Quoniam

TL;DR
This paper proposes a methodology to evaluate and select software tools for website analytics and search engine ranking monitoring, addressing challenges posed by evolving algorithms and KPI centralization.
Contribution
It introduces a systematic approach to compare and choose software for website analytics and SEO tracking, improving decision-making processes.
Findings
Developed a comprehensive evaluation methodology
Facilitated better software selection for SEO projects
Enhanced understanding of software effectiveness
Abstract
In order to measure website visibility in search engines, there are softwares for analytics and referencing follow-up. They permit to quantify website's efficacity of referencing and optimize its positionning in search engines. With regard to search engines' algorithms' evolution and centralization of Key Performance Indicators for Marketing decision making, it becomes hard to find solutions to effectively lead a lot of projects for referencing. That's why we have built a methodology in order compare, evaluate and choose a software for analytics and referencing follow-up in search engines.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsWeb visibility and informetrics · Business Strategy and Innovation · Diverse multidisciplinary academic research
