Variable binding, symmetric monoidal closed theories, and bigraphs
Richard Garner, Tom Hirschowitz (LAMA), Aur\'elien Pardon (LIP)

TL;DR
This paper explores using symmetric monoidal closed (SMC) structures to represent syntax with variable binding, especially for linear languages, and applies this to bigraphs to offer an alternative categorical framework.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to modeling variable binding syntax using SMC theories and applies it to bigraphs, providing an alternative categorical perspective.
Findings
SMC theories can effectively model variable binding syntax.
Application to bigraphs yields an alternative categorical framework.
Comparison shows differences between original and new bigraph categories.
Abstract
This paper investigates the use of symmetric monoidal closed (SMC) structure for representing syntax with variable binding, in particular for languages with linear aspects. In our setting, one first specifies an SMC theory T, which may express binding operations, in a way reminiscent from higher-order abstract syntax. This theory generates an SMC category S(T) whose morphisms are, in a sense, terms in the desired syntax. We apply our approach to Jensen and Milner's (abstract binding) bigraphs, which are linear w.r.t. processes. This leads to an alternative category of bigraphs, which we compare to the original.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, programming, and type systems · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · semigroups and automata theory
